the artist interview trap
yesterday, i was Rotting Online as i tend to often do when home alone. i came across a front-facing camera video of a music journalist who writes for billboard. the hook was “music journalists’ #1 pet peeve,” and she revealed it was when an artist describes a new release as “the most vulnerable they’ve ever been” or “extremely personal.” in the moment, i had no problem agreeing with her. those sorts of explanations of the work are vague, and it’s much easier to write a journalistic piece when the artist is able to more thoughtfully express their intentions beyond simply relating it to how true it is to them (relative to past work).
i’m in the midst of rolling out quite a bit of new music, with the first single releasing tomorrow. my mind is fully consumed by how to express the process of putting all this work together, chasing the seed of a concept, letting myself steep in the feeling, allowing that internal flow to lead each session, patch-working the ideas that further push and grow that conceptual seed, collaborating with artist friends to translate these ideas and sounds into visuals, photos, illustrations, physical items, constantly returning to that initial seed to check if what i grew matches with what i initially planted. my mind is fully consumed by how to express all of that in a sentence, maybe even a few - if the character count allows.
the problem with this journalistic problem is that it requires people to actually engage with the work. it requires the artist to further engage with their work beyond the initial expression, it requires the journalist to engage with the artists’ work on a deeper level than an interview, it requires the listener to engage with the artists’ work so they can place the new release relative to previous works. if everyone further engages with the work and the artist is genuine in their “vulnerability,” it should be very clear just from listening to the music what they mean when they say it is “extremely personal.”
i believe that art is an expression of what a person can’t just explicitly say out loud - that’s the point. whether the work is an attempt to know the unknown or tell a story the artist isn’t ready to tell in a straightforward way, it is meant to be the vehicle of that expression, so inherently, it probably isn’t very easy to simply put into words what the intention of the work is. some of my favorite conversations with artists about their work devolve into long tangents for this very reason. it’s extremely challenging and requires another kind of creative skillset to wrap it up with a bow for an easy headline, especially when it’s personal. one might argue that is precisely the work of a music journalist.
ultimately, this isn’t a jab at that billboard writer at all. and despite everything i just said, i do think it is important for an artist to be able to get to that place of expressing in words what their work means. the actual problem is the rate at which art is consumed and dismissed. no one has ample time to think or engage with art on a meaningful level when we’re all rushing to be seen, just to be scrolled past.
well if you’re still reading, maybe you’re the change we all seek. and my first official single release in two years drops tomorrow. it’s called “let’s get used” and it’s actually extremely straightforward, but something i felt i couldn’t explicitly discuss at the time i wrote it. it’s about going on tour with my girlfriend who is also a musician, and observing the way each of our management / agency teams were willing to pit us against each other for their own gain.
and we still fucking did it anyway.
pre-save: https://found.ee/qrtr_letsgetused